An analysis of the different theories on the origin of the moon

This is because at very high impact velocities a volume much larger than the projectile volume is at least vaporized and it is the integral over all this volume that is relevant Also if the Moon would had come into being just as a 'lump' of mantle material, its rocks would have had to contain more nickel and less of the other siderophile elements due to the fact that when the Earth formed it had not attained full equilibrium.

Just as the asteroid belt today has a largest asteroid Ceres at a km diameter, and several smaller bodies in the km diameter range, the region of Earth's orbit would have had several bodies up to about half the size of the growing Earth. And this is the way the moon was born.

In this discourse, he tried to explain the occurrence of the tides as the result of the Earth 's rotation and revolution around the Sun. At that meeting, the giant impact hypothesis emerged as the leading hypothesis and has remained in that role ever since.

Modern scientific study of our neighbor began inwhen Galileo, training his spyglass on the moon, became the first person to see the dark and light regions for what they really were: The Earth has a large iron core, but the moon does not.

Indeed, results from Apollo showed the pair to be more intimately connected than previously thought. This idea would produce a moon similar to Earth's mantle, but it failed when analysis of the total angular momentum and energy involved indicated that the present Earth-moon system could not form in this way.

Computer simulations show a need for a glancing blow, which causes a portion of the collider to form a long arm of material that then shears off. In order to simulate the formation of a single moon sized body one needs to begin with at least a lunar mass outside the Roche limit.

Iron is also comparably volatile to the silicates as FeO and Hashimoto suggested that the iron oxide would have evaporated away. Her later work fall led to more "success" in aggregating the debris into a single moon. The temperatures of the impacting bodies were set to K which is an agreed value for an early Earth's surface temperature.

The main theoretical obstacle is the high encounter velocity typically a few kilometres per second and the required dissipation of the satellite's kinetic energy. This would ultimately have lead to an increase in velocity rather than decrease.

However, after moon rocks were analyzed and introduced to the equation, they largely debunked this theory because the moon rock compositions differed from those in the Pacific Ocean. That makes it distinct from every other major object in the Solar System, said Sarah Stewart, professor of earth and planetary sciences at the University of California, Davis and senior author on the paper.

A fraction of that debris went into orbit around the Earth and aggregated into the moon. As this so-called magma ocean cooled, intense volcanism continued for about million years. Coriolis effects are introduced as well as lateral forcing by gravity. In many ways, the Earth is remarkably similar to its lifeless satellite.

When Theia hit Earth, a portion of the planet came off and eventually hardened into the moon. The early solar system was a violent place, and a number of bodies were created that never made it to full planetary status.

The work is published Oct. This book remains the prime reference on this subject. Eventually the disk scale height becomes so small that the disk's own gravity becomes predominant, due to density waves in the denser regions of the disk.

It also seems to explain the siderophile element depletion placing "the moon's nickel in the earth's core" Ringwood, Have you heard that the moon once occupied the space now filled by the Pacific Ocean.

One possible scenario involves a gradual and progressive slowing down of the proto-satellite's velocity.

Galileo's attempt to explain the tides[ edit ] Justus Sustermans — Portrait of Galileo Galilei, "The greater circle represents the orbit of the Earth around the Sun A second early idea was that the moon formed somewhere else in the solar system where there was little iron, and then was captured into orbit around Earth.

Add to that the understanding reached decades ago that the Pacific basin formed less than 70 million years ago and therefore could not possibly have spawned the moon, and the Darwin-Fisher model suddenly comes up short.

It is compositionally different, with fewer volatile elements—those that tend to boil off at high temperature. If its total energy gravitational plus kinetic is positive then debris escapes on a hyperbolic trajectory; otherwise it traverses a closed elliptical orbit destined to re-impact the planet's surface.

The Earth was set spinning with a two-hour day, its axis pointing towards the Sun.

Origin of the Moon

Hartmann Studies of lunar rocks show that the moon originally had a molten surface. The capture theory would explain the differences in the composition of Earth and its moon. Under the capture theory, a rocky body formed elsewhere in the solar system could have been drawn into orbit around Earth.

Unlike those in all meteorites ever analyzed, the nonradioactive, stable isotopes of oxygen in moon and Earth rocks match like blood types, implying the two spheres formed at the same radial distance from the sun.

But today it faces the same problem regarding the core. A New Theory for the Moon’s Origin. by Dr. Danny R. Faulkner on March 20, Share: Email Using: Gmail Yahoo! Outlook Other.

Evolutionary scientists invoke a completely different scenario for the origin of the many other natural satellites in the solar system. Supposedly, only the earth’s moon formed by glancing collisions with the. Theories Of The Origin Of The Moon Essays: OverTheories Of The Origin Of The Moon Essays, Theories Of The Origin Of The Moon Term Papers, Theories Of The Origin Of The Moon Research Paper, Book Reports.

ESSAYS, term and research papers available for UNLIMITED access. 4 theories about how the moon formed philosophers and artists throughout history. According to the capture theory, the moon traveled about the solar system before getting stuck in Earth's.

The Different Theories Of How The Universe Was Created; The Different Theories Of How The Universe Was Created The scientific theories of the origin of the universe do sometimes have some scientific evidence but it can never be proven.

On the fourth day God created the sun, moon, and the stars to give light to the earth, and to separate.

Why are there 5 theories on the moon's origin?

The origin of the Moon is usually explained by a Mars-sized body striking the Earth, making a debris ring that eventually collected into a single natural satellite, the Moon, but there are a number of variations on this giant-impact hypothesis, as well as alternate explanations, and research into.

The result of the analysis demonstrated that all three leading theories were unsupported and a new theory would need to be advanced to explain the moon's origin. Giant Impact Theory - states that a Mars-sized object slammed into the Earth, knocking off a huge piece of the planet.

An analysis of the different theories on the origin of the moon
Rated 0/5 based on 65 review
The Different Theories Of How The Universe Was Created - Sample Essays